top of page

The Invisible Caregiver

  • Writer: Aaron Marcum
    Aaron Marcum
  • 15 hours ago
  • 5 min read

Years ago, at Arbor Senior Care (my first home care agency I started in 2002), I got a call on a Saturday afternoon while I was at my daughter’s soccer game. A caregiver had called out. A client with dementia was going to be alone within the hour. Nobody else in the office knew how to reach the backup list, because the backup list wasn’t really a list. It was in my head.


I missed the second half of that game standing in a parking lot, making calls, patching together a solution nobody else could have patched together, because I’d never built it so anyone else could.


That was the job for years. Not leading. Patching.


I tell you that story because the operational chaos I’m about to describe isn’t a hypothetical for me. It’s the reason Arbor struggled after I sold it. I didn’t just sell a business. I sold a business that only really worked with me standing inside it.

 

The Real Cost of Chaos

We talk a lot in this industry about culture and retention, and rightly so. It’s the most important drive of growth. But there’s a close second, a quieter drain on every founder’s time and every buyer’s confidence: operations that live in someone’s head instead of in a system.


Care coordination is the clearest example. Matching the right caregiver to the right client isn’t just a scheduling puzzle. It’s personality fit, skill fit, geography, continuity, family preference, a dozen soft variables that an experienced coordinator juggles by instinct. That instinct is valuable. It’s also fragile. It walks out the door when that coordinator does, and it doesn’t transfer to a new hire through a training manual, because nobody wrote it down. Nobody could. It never lived anywhere except in someone’s head.


I’ve said this before and I’ll keep saying it: documentation alone was never the answer. I had documentation at Arbor. I had procedures, checklists, notes taped to monitors. What I didn’t have was a system, something organized enough, and living enough, that a person who didn’t build it could actually run it.


That gap is exactly where I believe AI earns its place in your operation.

 

What AI Actually Does Here

Used well, AI-assisted scheduling and care coordination doesn’t replace the coordinator’s judgment. It captures it, and it makes it repeatable.


Matching engines (many scheduling software providers either have this capability or will have it) can now hold far more variables at once than any one person can juggle in their head under pressure, continuity history, skill certifications, drive time, family feedback patterns, and surface the best three options instead of the first available name. Predictive scheduling, driven by AI, can flag a likely call-out risk before it becomes a Sunday afternoon crisis, based on patterns a human wouldn’t catch until it was too late. Coordination platforms can hold the institutional knowledge that used to live only in your best coordinator’s head, so when she goes on vacation, or leaves for a better opportunity, the business doesn’t lose the thing that made her irreplaceable. It gains a system that made her replicable.


That word matters. Replicable, not replaceable. Your best coordinator’s judgment doesn’t disappear into a machine. It gets extracted, organized, and made available to whoever needs it next, including her own future replacement, and including a buyer’s operations integration team.


Tip – AI is also a wonderful process creator, on all 4 levels that EOS (Entrepreneurial Operating System®), preaches about. It can help (1) identify your core processes, (2) document your core processes, (3) package and design your core processes, and (4) help manage the Followed by All (FBA) of each of the processes. At Riverside, we prefer to use Claude.ai for this and I am beginning to use Notebook LM to build out some of the leadership training for my team.

 

Why This Is a Valuation Conversation, Not Just an Operations Conversation

I sit on the other side of the table now, as the Visionary and a managing partner at Riverside Home Care, evaluating agencies through the Founders Proven Process. I promise you, the first question every serious buyer asks, whether they say it out loud or not, is some version of: what happens to this business the day the founder stops showing up?


An agency where care coordination runs on one irreplaceable person’s instinct is an agency a buyer will discount, or walk away from entirely. Not because the coordinator isn’t excellent. Because excellence that can’t transfer isn’t an asset.


An agency where that same judgment has been captured, organized, and built into a system that a new hire can actually learn from, that’s a different conversation. That’s the difference between a founder who has to stay in the room and a founder who gets to finally leave it.


Key tip: A key way of doing this is using AI systems, like Notebook LM, to create short process training videos that capture a full process.


This is the operational half of the exit story I’ve been building toward all series. Culture keeps your people. Systems, AI-assisted or not, prove your business can run without you standing inside it every Sunday afternoon.

 

The Line I Recommend You Don’t Cross

Here’s my caution, and it’s the same caution I gave you last time about culture: AI can organize the judgment. It cannot make the judgment for you when something doesn’t fit the pattern.


A matching algorithm can surface the best three care professionals for a client. It cannot sit with a struggling family and decide, in that moment, that what their mom needs isn’t the highest-scoring match, it’s the care professional who you intuitively know will connect in ways others simply won’t. That call still belongs to a human being who knows your clients and care professionals, not a system that only knows your data.


The agencies that get this wrong treat the algorithm’s output as the final answer instead of the first draft. The ones that get it right use AI to clear the noise, so their best coordinators spend their time on the calls that actually require a human being, instead of drowning in the ones that didn’t.

 

Back to That Parking Lot

I think about that Sunday often. Not with regret exactly, more with clarity about what I’d build differently. I wasn’t a hero that day. I was a single point of failure who happened to answer his phone.

The founders I respect most today aren’t the ones who can solve every crisis personally. They’re the ones who’ve built something that doesn’t need them to.

 

If you're ready to find out whether your operations could survive a Sunday afternoon without you, and what that means for your eventual exit, visit www.rivhc.com/founders.

P.S. I still remember the score of that soccer game. I don’t remember which care professional I finally reached. That should tell you something about where my attention actually needed to be.


 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page